gokulnkreading listnotes

Word2Vec and BERT are both popular methods in the field of natural language processing (NLP) and have been widely adopted for various applications. They represent words (or tokens) in continuous vector spaces but are based on different principles and architectures. Let's compare them:

1. Word2Vec

Definition:

Word2Vec is an unsupervised learning algorithm that learns vector representations for words based on their co-occurrences in a given corpus. There are two main architectures for Word2Vec: Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW) and Skip-Gram.

Characteristics:

  • Representation: Each word is represented as a fixed-size vector.
  • Context: Word2Vec captures semantic and syntactic word relationships based on local context (surrounding words).
  • Training: Trained to predict context words given a target word (Skip-Gram) or vice versa (CBOW).
  • Embedding size: Typically between 100 to 300 dimensions.
  • Transferability: The embeddings can be used in downstream tasks, but they are static (i.e., the same word always has the same embedding).

Advantages:

  • Efficient and fast to train.
  • Produces embeddings that capture various linguistic patterns.

Disadvantages:

  • Cannot handle out-of-vocabulary words.
  • Does not account for polysemy (the same word can have multiple meanings).
  • Relatively shallow compared to newer models like BERT.

2. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)

Definition:

BERT is a pre-trained deep bidirectional transformer architecture designed for understanding the meaning of each word in a sentence by considering the entire context in both directions (left and right).

Characteristics:

  • Representation: BERT represents words in the context of other words in a sentence. As a result, the same word can have different embeddings in different contexts.
  • Context: BERT considers the entire sentence, making it capable of understanding context more deeply.
  • Training: Pre-trained on large corpora using masked language model (MLM) tasks and next sentence prediction.
  • Embedding size: BERT embeddings are typically much larger (e.g., 768 dimensions for BERT-base).
  • Transferability: Fine-tuned for specific downstream tasks, allowing transfer learning.

Advantages:

  • Captures deep contextual relationships.
  • Can handle polysemy by producing different embeddings for a word based on its context.
  • State-of-the-art performance on many NLP benchmarks.

Disadvantages:

  • Requires a lot of computational resources to train.
  • Model sizes are quite large, which can be a concern for deployment in resource-constrained environments.

Summary:

  • Word2Vec: A simpler, fast, and efficient model to get word embeddings. Suitable for tasks where contextual depth isn't as critical.
  • BERT: A state-of-the-art deep learning model that understands word context at a deeper level. Suitable for tasks requiring deep semantic understanding and context.

The choice between Word2Vec and BERT depends on the application, the available computational resources, and the need for contextual understanding. For many modern NLP tasks, BERT and its variants (like RoBERTa, DistilBERT, etc.) have become the go-to models due to their superior performance. However, Word2Vec still remains relevant and useful for many applications, especially when simplicity and efficiency are desired.

    All notes
    gokulnkreadinglistnotes